Dining table nine

Strength of homophily/confounding indicates prevalence (?_{step one}) of omitted variable in divorced egos. ₀ = 1 – ?₁. A value of ?₁ = 0.5 indicates no confounding/homophily, and ?₁ = 1 indicates maximum confounding/ homophily.

The new Part regarding Youngsters

We examined whether college students might have a defensive impression in accordance in order to divorce. As the listed earlier, most literary works and you can cross-sectional research advise that people slow down the likelihood of separation a little, hence childlessness is precipitate splitting up. Table 10 suggests the relationship anywhere between quantity of youngsters and breakup and in addition we select zero eg effect; in fact, part of the effect of students with the splitting up is quite positive, albeit not significant (p=0.15). not, as soon as we likewise incorporate a connections between your alter’s past split up position and you can ego’s number of youngsters during the prior test, we discover that every a lot more child notably (p=0.04) reduces the association between alter’s splitting up updates and you can ego’s likelihood of delivering divorced. To possess partners no college students the outcome is a lot stronger than average: an alter who was simply previously separated during the last examination almost quadruples the present day threat of divorce case on pride (+390%, 95% C.I. 80% so you can 900%).